<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear of death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/</link>
	<description>A dad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oldgreedy</title>
		<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>oldgreedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Nate, the more one tries to broaden the meaning of &quot;fear of death,&quot; the less meaningful it becomes. How is it different from &quot;self-interest&quot;? Or &quot;desire to live better&quot;, or &quot;being human&quot;?

How does fear of death tie into the many battles of conquest over the centuries, such as destroying the native Americans? Do conflicts over oil stem from fear of death? You could make a case I am sure, but it seems too indirect to be too meaningful. I could tie everything to fear of death, because nearly everything we do is connected to some selfish motive.

Anyway, selfishness is so inherent to being alive that getting rid of it on a grand scale is certainly futile. We&#039;ll have to find another way to solve the world&#039;s problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, the more one tries to broaden the meaning of &#8220;fear of death,&#8221; the less meaningful it becomes. How is it different from &#8220;self-interest&#8221;? Or &#8220;desire to live better&#8221;, or &#8220;being human&#8221;?</p>
<p>How does fear of death tie into the many battles of conquest over the centuries, such as destroying the native Americans? Do conflicts over oil stem from fear of death? You could make a case I am sure, but it seems too indirect to be too meaningful. I could tie everything to fear of death, because nearly everything we do is connected to some selfish motive.</p>
<p>Anyway, selfishness is so inherent to being alive that getting rid of it on a grand scale is certainly futile. We&#8217;ll have to find another way to solve the world&#8217;s problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Great rant, man.  

For more on the second half of Dave&#039;s second paragraph, try Joseph E. Stiglitz &quot;Making Globalization Work&quot; and Michael Mandelbaum &quot;The Case for Goliath&quot; -- two books I had to read for class.

Seriously-- champion rant.  I liked the first paragraph too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great rant, man.  </p>
<p>For more on the second half of Dave&#8217;s second paragraph, try Joseph E. Stiglitz &#8220;Making Globalization Work&#8221; and Michael Mandelbaum &#8220;The Case for Goliath&#8221; &#8212; two books I had to read for class.</p>
<p>Seriously&#8211; champion rant.  I liked the first paragraph too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pappa</title>
		<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>pappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>i wanna start off by saying something like &quot;its not a fear of death that&#039;s the problem, but a lack of love&quot;... age of aquarius type stuff.  hmm.  the big problems seem laughable, really.  they aren&#039;t, sure, but they seem so disconnected from everyone&#039;s day to day struggles.  every person&#039;s life is the most significant thing to them,  with a close circle of significance radiating outward and losing strenth as distance grows in connections.  so there are all these billions of people trying to figure things out, trying to take care of their families, their communities, or maybe just even trying to keep their own shit in check, and that&#039;s enough.  
Then well educated, or just well-meaning folks come along and try to diagnose the issues that nations have, or people as a race?  its the complexity of the macro and the micro happening at the same time.  just as a person can undergo a major shift in their understanding at certain times in their life, i think its probable that nations or communities can as well.  no one is ever completely happy with such a communal revolution - because its all comprimise at some point. 
then there is the issue of media, and the confusion of translation, between two cultures.  jihadists surely claim that we Westerners are &#039;insane&#039;, just as you, nate, say that of them.  spending all of our time creating and exporting fairy tale hollywood images, stealing the world&#039;s resources, consolidating a global banking/industrial system to take better advantage of the &#039;global south&#039;, always rewriting the post-colonial rulebook to keep indebted nations stuck in their positions.  Do we not (as a people) play the dual roles of ignorant oppressor, and benevolent providers?  Might that not be slightly &#039;insane&#039;, or at the very least, schizophrenic?
okay, this is off target and very nearly a rant.  I&#039;m going back to work
thanks for your patience</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wanna start off by saying something like &#8220;its not a fear of death that&#8217;s the problem, but a lack of love&#8221;&#8230; age of aquarius type stuff.  hmm.  the big problems seem laughable, really.  they aren&#8217;t, sure, but they seem so disconnected from everyone&#8217;s day to day struggles.  every person&#8217;s life is the most significant thing to them,  with a close circle of significance radiating outward and losing strenth as distance grows in connections.  so there are all these billions of people trying to figure things out, trying to take care of their families, their communities, or maybe just even trying to keep their own shit in check, and that&#8217;s enough.<br />
Then well educated, or just well-meaning folks come along and try to diagnose the issues that nations have, or people as a race?  its the complexity of the macro and the micro happening at the same time.  just as a person can undergo a major shift in their understanding at certain times in their life, i think its probable that nations or communities can as well.  no one is ever completely happy with such a communal revolution &#8211; because its all comprimise at some point.<br />
then there is the issue of media, and the confusion of translation, between two cultures.  jihadists surely claim that we Westerners are &#8216;insane&#8217;, just as you, nate, say that of them.  spending all of our time creating and exporting fairy tale hollywood images, stealing the world&#8217;s resources, consolidating a global banking/industrial system to take better advantage of the &#8216;global south&#8217;, always rewriting the post-colonial rulebook to keep indebted nations stuck in their positions.  Do we not (as a people) play the dual roles of ignorant oppressor, and benevolent providers?  Might that not be slightly &#8216;insane&#8217;, or at the very least, schizophrenic?<br />
okay, this is off target and very nearly a rant.  I&#8217;m going back to work<br />
thanks for your patience</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerknerd</title>
		<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>jerknerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I think your idea of the fear of death is too limited, Dave. Life continues not just in breath, but in legend and history (this would cover suicide bombers, Hitler, and all those who seem willing to die, as well as all the motivations toward preservation of things other than the self). 

And to suggest that an entire population is willing to be a suicide bomber is very Cheyney-ish of you. From my limited knowledge, suicide bombers are often desperate people even by oppressed society standards. They&#039;re treated like cultists, fed only a certain type of information and basically tricked into thinking that they can make their mark in this way - and this desire to make their mark and strengthen and continue their family lines demonstrates their fear of capital D Death (the end of their family line and their entire culture). 

I don&#039;t think we disagree, but I would call ego an extension of the fear of death. Needing to matter seems to me to be a direct response to the fact that we know we don&#039;t matter. Hence conquering the fear of death would conquer ego.

Defying death doesn&#039;t mean conquering your fear of death. Facing it, maybe, but not conquering it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your idea of the fear of death is too limited, Dave. Life continues not just in breath, but in legend and history (this would cover suicide bombers, Hitler, and all those who seem willing to die, as well as all the motivations toward preservation of things other than the self). </p>
<p>And to suggest that an entire population is willing to be a suicide bomber is very Cheyney-ish of you. From my limited knowledge, suicide bombers are often desperate people even by oppressed society standards. They&#8217;re treated like cultists, fed only a certain type of information and basically tricked into thinking that they can make their mark in this way &#8211; and this desire to make their mark and strengthen and continue their family lines demonstrates their fear of capital D Death (the end of their family line and their entire culture). </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we disagree, but I would call ego an extension of the fear of death. Needing to matter seems to me to be a direct response to the fact that we know we don&#8217;t matter. Hence conquering the fear of death would conquer ego.</p>
<p>Defying death doesn&#8217;t mean conquering your fear of death. Facing it, maybe, but not conquering it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldgreedy</title>
		<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>oldgreedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Nate: I say wrong-o, but a valiant try to sum up the world&#039;s problems in one root cause. Andy, I like where you&#039;re going.

Nate, you can&#039;t just dismiss suicide bombers out of hand like that by calling them &quot;insane.&quot; How can an entire population be insane, and what makes them insane but the very willingness to die itself? On top of that, how would the elimination of the fear of death change the equation for suicide bombers?

If self-preservation were the motivation were the cause of the many injustices in the world, why would we assume people would work in one another&#039;s interest, rather than their own, if they were afraid of death? Isn&#039;t the suicide bomber a good example of that: I don&#039;t care if I live or die, but at least I can spend my life supporting the greater cause of my country. Maybe we would all be going into battle if we didn&#039;t fear death.

Perhaps it&#039;s the ego that would need to be squashed. People are motivated by things other than self-preservation, including: preservation of family, of country, and increasing one&#039;s power (potentially a self-preservation step) and comfort level. Inequalities are driven by people&#039;s drive for more without necessarily being tied to a longer life. People who defy death are no more peaceful or in-touch than those who are risk averse. I don&#039;t think leaders start wars to preserve their own lives; in fact, they are risking their lives by the simple fact of being a leader. Was Hitler afraid of death? He killed himself rather than be captured.

I guess I&#039;ll need to see a few scenarios before I can see exactly how eliminating the fear of death can help things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate: I say wrong-o, but a valiant try to sum up the world&#8217;s problems in one root cause. Andy, I like where you&#8217;re going.</p>
<p>Nate, you can&#8217;t just dismiss suicide bombers out of hand like that by calling them &#8220;insane.&#8221; How can an entire population be insane, and what makes them insane but the very willingness to die itself? On top of that, how would the elimination of the fear of death change the equation for suicide bombers?</p>
<p>If self-preservation were the motivation were the cause of the many injustices in the world, why would we assume people would work in one another&#8217;s interest, rather than their own, if they were afraid of death? Isn&#8217;t the suicide bomber a good example of that: I don&#8217;t care if I live or die, but at least I can spend my life supporting the greater cause of my country. Maybe we would all be going into battle if we didn&#8217;t fear death.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s the ego that would need to be squashed. People are motivated by things other than self-preservation, including: preservation of family, of country, and increasing one&#8217;s power (potentially a self-preservation step) and comfort level. Inequalities are driven by people&#8217;s drive for more without necessarily being tied to a longer life. People who defy death are no more peaceful or in-touch than those who are risk averse. I don&#8217;t think leaders start wars to preserve their own lives; in fact, they are risking their lives by the simple fact of being a leader. Was Hitler afraid of death? He killed himself rather than be captured.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll need to see a few scenarios before I can see exactly how eliminating the fear of death can help things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerknerd.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/fear-of-death/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>I agree!

Yet how could you be sure you&#039;ve ever eliminated your own fear of death?  In a real life-or-death situation, I assume that every living organism has a basic hardwired fear of death.  I&#039;m talking deeply, deeply hardwired, like hardwire #1.  The only way to really test yourself would be to engage in a fatal activity.  Other than living, I mean.

We could follow the example of dare-devils who risk their lives for money, sport, or glory... but those people aren&#039;t really afraid of death.  It&#039;s the adrenaline rush brought on by the death-fear that they thrive on, right?

If we became indifferent to death would we still prefer life?  Buddha overcame the fear of death, and was nice enough to stick around and teach us about it, but his conclusion was that the best outcome is to stop existing. 

Can the fear of death be diminished through learning or meditation or courageous acts?  Is there a fear-of-death gene that could be knocked out?  Why is it that cocaine and alcohol can diminish the fear of death?  Is there a medicine we could take to accomplish this?   
  
In order to solve all the problems of humanity, we should broaden our goal from eliminating the fear of death to eliminating the fear of loss, since our lives are rarely threatened while other things--objects, money, opportunity, youth, loved ones, the world as we know it--are threatened, changed, or are passing away all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree!</p>
<p>Yet how could you be sure you&#8217;ve ever eliminated your own fear of death?  In a real life-or-death situation, I assume that every living organism has a basic hardwired fear of death.  I&#8217;m talking deeply, deeply hardwired, like hardwire #1.  The only way to really test yourself would be to engage in a fatal activity.  Other than living, I mean.</p>
<p>We could follow the example of dare-devils who risk their lives for money, sport, or glory&#8230; but those people aren&#8217;t really afraid of death.  It&#8217;s the adrenaline rush brought on by the death-fear that they thrive on, right?</p>
<p>If we became indifferent to death would we still prefer life?  Buddha overcame the fear of death, and was nice enough to stick around and teach us about it, but his conclusion was that the best outcome is to stop existing. </p>
<p>Can the fear of death be diminished through learning or meditation or courageous acts?  Is there a fear-of-death gene that could be knocked out?  Why is it that cocaine and alcohol can diminish the fear of death?  Is there a medicine we could take to accomplish this?   </p>
<p>In order to solve all the problems of humanity, we should broaden our goal from eliminating the fear of death to eliminating the fear of loss, since our lives are rarely threatened while other things&#8211;objects, money, opportunity, youth, loved ones, the world as we know it&#8211;are threatened, changed, or are passing away all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
